Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Python Newsgroups: sci.logic Subject: Re: Analytic Expressions of language not linked to their semantic meaning are simply untrue Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 01:58:32 +0200 Organization: CCCP Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <9d7f02ce4b72af3d518594b5446d4fe8b19fbd6d@i2pn2.org> <9808bbccb9a847f1389b525845d7944d2826ab8e@i2pn2.org> <0b98cd09656fbeef618555dc65a81e91fd6ea22d@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2024 01:58:33 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="400693b476d091b85efb0f0dd1b3a437"; logging-data="3833350"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/CpC+x35eq2NKMWhOgo+i9" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:4LkpAhDT/Y6cllbVUlbOMFPgoRo= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 1837 Le 04/08/2024 à 01:46, olcott a écrit : > I may not have done it correctly yet any proof can be > refuted by simply showing that its conclusion is wrong > with no need to even understand any of the steps. This is kind a weak against proofs that you are wrong Peter.