Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as
 non-halting V2
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 10:02:01 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <v78mda$1smtm$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v6rg65$32o1o$3@dont-email.me>
 <a177dd76613794d6bb877c65ffe6c587a8f31bc1@i2pn2.org>
 <v6tvpv$3imib$14@dont-email.me>
 <091e8b7baeea467ee894b1c79c8943cb9773adb7@i2pn2.org>
 <v6u346$3khl8$1@dont-email.me>
 <16ac79611a441e7e01119631051f69119eee958a@i2pn2.org>
 <v6v06i$3pivt$1@dont-email.me>
 <23cb2d2401b87bf4f6a604aa1a78b93ffc9a29bc@i2pn2.org>
 <v6v2t1$3pmjn$3@dont-email.me>
 <3fc6548531f91ed14a27420caf9679a634573ed0@i2pn2.org>
 <v70lmo$61d8$1@dont-email.me>
 <8a6e6d9ff49aabe2525ce5729a439c807de4768a@i2pn2.org>
 <34Ocnd4voeWlDAn7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <v725d7$hlvg$1@dont-email.me>
 <aa7643b6d8c46d2c4dd5ef92ae3650afe114adbb@i2pn2.org>
 <v734ct$mjis$2@dont-email.me>
 <056325e336f81a50f4fb9e60f90934eaac823d22@i2pn2.org>
 <v73gk2$obtd$1@dont-email.me>
 <e2958e7ea04d53590c79b53bfb4bc9dff468772b@i2pn2.org>
 <v742r2$s48s$2@dont-email.me>
 <210383b2ee318f68a96d94aec314ee8b93f79b7f@i2pn2.org>
 <v75u22$19j7l$4@dont-email.me>
 <fde630817c49562bc765bdbc98e16a1582bcad53@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 17:02:02 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f64513aa3f157d417bd9d336ffe725cf";
	logging-data="1989558"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18viDSKDJiCAnFFkDqOqkgm"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RhSYuCxMfS+pICKqRZ0g5nqsn+8=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <fde630817c49562bc765bdbc98e16a1582bcad53@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 3979

On 7/16/2024 1:06 PM, joes wrote:
> Am Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:54:10 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>> On 7/16/2024 3:23 AM, joes wrote:
>>> Am Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:03:30 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>> On 7/15/2024 3:58 PM, joes wrote:
>>>>> Am Mon, 15 Jul 2024 10:52:34 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>> On 7/15/2024 9:04 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>> Am Mon, 15 Jul 2024 07:23:57 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>> On 7/15/2024 3:59 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Am Sun, 14 Jul 2024 22:35:03 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/14/2024 10:02 PM, Mike Terry wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Any input that must be aborted to prevent the non termination of
>>>>>>>>>> simulating termination analyzer HHH necessarily specifies
>>>>>>>>>> non-halting behavior or it would never need to be aborted.
>>>>>>>>> It's just that the input HHH halts and does not need to be
>>>>>>>>> aborted.
>>>>>>>> At the point that it is aborted it did need to be aborted
>>>>>>> Because it hadn't halted yet?
>>>>>> Because HHH has seen a repeating state that proves that DDD
>>>>>> correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly ever stop running unless
>>>>>> aborted.
>>>>> Which state is it that repeats forever?
>>>> *It had never been which state DOES repeat forever*
>>>> *It has always been which state WOULD repeat forever if not aborted*
>>> Well then, which state of HHH would repeat forever?
>> It is not "which state of HHH would repeat forever?"
>> It is: Which state of HHH would repeat forever if not aborted?

> Those two are the same, but different to what you said above.
> HHH does not repeat forever because it makes sure to stop simulating
> anything that does.
> 

I proved that they are not the same in the part that
you skipped.

>>>> Infinite_Loop() doesn't even repeat forever because it is aborted.
>>> By itself it does.
> 

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer