Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Moebius <invalid@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:09:31 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <v9glir$3aq4$1@dont-email.me>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <v93a8c$7o8h$1@dont-email.me>
 <v93eud$9abg$1@dont-email.me> <d4dd199f-088e-4b0e-b40e-a0f2366731e7@att.net>
 <hsF1KQs0AQ1chexm5WbqhBC9qdw@jntp>
 <7490d737-bfd0-431e-862b-2f06ead37c90@att.net>
 <RK4S1_zM8dN3ZmqNitRSqU5p6Tc@jntp>
 <86b4ae54-b252-49b4-a835-b701ec1bacdf@att.net>
 <bXKL28bHgeFdCk5SZY53YFgJJUs@jntp>
 <7283ed38-26be-4ded-9dc1-ba879c881fe8@att.net>
 <nrBsep-L2K1nhRzOO5WLsFEZwXQ@jntp> <v9gboa$1g5h$7@dont-email.me>
 <1c261312-b924-4315-af66-da92ba00ccb0@att.net>
Reply-To: invalid@example.invalid
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:09:31 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e65c031eb2f02c4f5a7b198ef229a13c";
	logging-data="109380"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19JfISx+3+qF5h9MbszPSbc"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5HT1nYawkS848a50HpcvbZO/Tm4=
In-Reply-To: <1c261312-b924-4315-af66-da92ba00ccb0@att.net>
Content-Language: de-DE
Bytes: 2424

Am 13.08.2024 um 23:54 schrieb Jim Burns:
> On 8/13/2024 3:21 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 8/13/2024 7:27 AM, WM wrote:
>>> Le 12/08/2024 à 20:34, Jim Burns a écrit :
>>>> On 8/12/2024 9:47 AM, WM wrote:
> 
>>>>> Before the bound there is the end,
>>>>> perhaps dark.
>>>
>>>> 0 is
>>>> greatest.lower.bound β of visibleᵂᴹ unit.fractions
>>>
>>> Yes. But the smallest unit fractions comes before.
>>
>> This irks me a bit.
>> The smallest unit fractions?
>> How do you define them?
>> What if
>> your version of "small" is _larger_ than
>> somebody else's version of "small"?
>> Is hyper small smaller than super small?
> 
> "It depends".
> 
> Note that super.duper small is
> between hyper.small and super.small.
> 
> OMG.small and WTF.small are left as
> an exercise for the reader.

You've forgotten about "extra small" (XS).