Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: question about nullptr Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:32:28 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 23 Message-ID: <874j8qs037.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> References: <20240706054641.175@kylheku.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 01:32:29 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8217c2b21d71c07ef505eee537ff3f41"; logging-data="978131"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ZDhWDJWiy62ZCnwJ/hyTh" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:FSwceIDjlIR5oV1UUvFZLpFPJqU= sha1:F70PE+Vjn0AUF49/A3LZSiTU7oM= Bytes: 1804 Lawrence D'Oliveiro writes: > On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 14:19:19 +0100, Richard Harnden wrote: >> Don't you use '\n'? Surely nobody would say 0x0a? > > Why not full symbolic Unicode names, à la Python: > > "\n" == "\N{LINE FEED}" > > ⇒ > > True Because C doesn't have that feature and is not expected to any time soon, because C doesn't specify that '\n' is line feed, and because using something like "\N{LINE FEED}" to denote a simple newline charater would be silly because '\n' is already standard and universally recognized by all C programmers. Why do you ask? Seriously, why did you ask this? -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */