Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eric Pozharski Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Python (was Re: I did not inhale) Followup-To: comp.unix.programmer Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 20:47:46 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <20240408075547.000061e8@gmail.com> <20240412094809.811@kylheku.com> <87il0mm94y.fsf@tudado.org> <87il0lldf8.fsf@tudado.org> <20240815182717.189@kylheku.com> Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 03:33:09 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="747bed46b9516b2762066fd259b22c55"; logging-data="2748233"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+HhxsFbqLJ5mTnOLSiPvJD" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Zqv/lgWbT+9l43rMCkCa0HyzxuU= Bytes: 2485 ["Followup-To:" header set to comp.unix.programmer.] ["Newsgroups:" comp.unix.shell has been dropped.] with Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On 2024-08-17 11:01, Muttley@dastardlyhq.com wrote: >> On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 15:02:20 -0000 (UTC) >> kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) gabbled: >>> So it is indeed a vague question of what belongs in given >>> programming languages. >> Indeed. And this gives rise to inconsistency. Why is threading now >> considered a core part of C++ but multi process isn't? Perhaps >> because Windows is hopeless at the latter in user space but it could >> just be personal preference within the C++ steering committee, who >> knows. > Windows inter-process API are far more advanced than what UNIX ever > had. It would be enough to mention famous file locks. These days But at what cost? (Hint: .) *SKIP* [ 6 lines 1 level deep] -- Torvalds' goal for Linux is very simple: World Domination Stallman's goal for GNU is even simpler: Freedom