Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Baby X is bor nagain Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 13:13:27 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 26 Message-ID: <87a5iyw7x4.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> References: <87ed8jnbmf.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <20240627201830.854@kylheku.com> <87msn1l3e5.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87bk3flty5.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87bk3f8hy5.fsf@bsb.me.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 22:13:28 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ebf0d30fa994b460063036c7c0e268b4"; logging-data="2467864"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19w5JbbhuA/2PZ4Mqk2Z4P6" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:RxX46RC1tZTZ6cNetx/2GcD0CNA= sha1:DTeCMUeoCgS6VuI7f7fGM6PKjac= Bytes: 2685 Malcolm McLean writes: [...] > And of course as a programming person I always want gcc and can't > imagine a Unix-type system without a commandline C compiler. And I had > a pretty clear memory that you got gcc by default. But other pepole > say not, and you check a box as you install. And so I suppose it must > be so. Different Linux-based distributions are different. Some provide gcc by default. Some do not. Some provide options during installation, letting the installer decide with varying degrees of granularity which packages are going to be installed. Almost all make it straightforward to install gcc and other packages after the initial setup, typically with a single command that might take a few minutes to run. It is demonstrably *not* the case that all Linux-based distribution install gcc by default. Personally, I don't pay much attention to whether gcc is installed initially. If I need it, I install it. I suggest that this discussion is no longer useful. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */