Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 08:22:05 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 15 Message-ID: <86ikvkzn8i.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <86o75d1ktx.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87ed69crn5.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 17:22:06 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6b5ad5f5888a1a6f98ce057847c0415f"; logging-data="3703286"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19gkI0w91isN4ywODW6g3YpqnChrFEZyPc=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:OlfCf7uNpLx1Y5Zl2n7yeop17nQ= sha1:2xQDzptG1D7CJtzjKgzA8jHzpKY= Bytes: 1731 Keith Thompson writes: > Tim Rentsch writes: > [...] > >> Not exactly. There are things that can be done inside a >> statement-expression that are not available inside nested >> functions or lambdas. > > And you're not going to tell us what those things are. As a rule I don't have a lot of sympathy for people who are too lazy to think for themselves. I'm sorry to say that class includes you a lot more often than would appear to be warrented.