Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 08:22:05 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <86ikvkzn8i.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <86o75d1ktx.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87ed69crn5.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 17:22:06 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6b5ad5f5888a1a6f98ce057847c0415f";
logging-data="3703286"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19gkI0w91isN4ywODW6g3YpqnChrFEZyPc="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OlfCf7uNpLx1Y5Zl2n7yeop17nQ=
sha1:2xQDzptG1D7CJtzjKgzA8jHzpKY=
Bytes: 1731
Keith Thompson writes:
> Tim Rentsch writes:
> [...]
>
>> Not exactly. There are things that can be done inside a
>> statement-expression that are not available inside nested
>> functions or lambdas.
>
> And you're not going to tell us what those things are.
As a rule I don't have a lot of sympathy for people who are
too lazy to think for themselves. I'm sorry to say that
class includes you a lot more often than would appear to be
warrented.