Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:39:03 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <vb6hv7$39dvq$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vb0lkb$1c1kh$2@dont-email.me> <vb1hdi$1feme$1@dont-email.me> <vb4erg$2s0uc$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 10:39:03 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4d0c86081244eebfddf3fd229f0dd949";
	logging-data="3454970"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/CbFd2OwhIYbUN3ID5aEAs"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:A/3L1fYjiezmlGvpmjzCaRdaemA=
Bytes: 1618

On 2024-09-02 13:33:36 +0000, olcott said:

> On 9/1/2024 5:58 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-09-01 03:04:43 +0000, olcott said:
>> 
>>> *I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases*
>>> 
>>> knowledge is a justified true belief such that the
>>> justification is sufficient reason to accept the
>>> truth of the belief.
>>> 
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier_problem
>> 
>> The remaining loophole is the lack of an exact definition
>> of "sufficient reason".
>> 
> 
> Ultimately sufficient reason is correct semantic
> entailment from verified facts.

The problem is "verified" facts: what is sufficient verification?

-- 
Mikko