Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "B. Pym" Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.scheme Subject: Re: Lisp newbie needs help Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 11:38:11 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 118 Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:38:11 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="04737eacfc9f816e64fd3f986b66e8f3"; logging-data="4159564"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/WllfzgqPnqIuvrY4ETMXV" User-Agent: XanaNews/1.18.1.6 Cancel-Lock: sha1:0rBd7U421pgL7a8B5jXJrGc0rNw= Bytes: 4064 B. Pym wrote: > B. Pym wrote: > > > > (defun my-test () > > > (loop for number = (1+ (random 6)) > > > as sum = number then (+ sum number) > > > until (= number 1) > > > do (format t "~&~D thrown. Sum: ~D" number sum) > > > finally (format t "~&One thrown."))) > > > > Gauche Scheme > > > > (use srfi-1) ;; unfold > > (use srfi-27) ;; random-integer > > > > (define (my-test) > > (fold > > (^(n sum) (print n " thrown. Sum: " (inc! sum n)) sum) > > 0 > > (cdr (unfold zero? ($ + 1 $) (^_ (random-integer 6)) -1))) > > (print "One thrown.")) > > > > > > gosh> (my-test) > > 2 thrown. Sum: 2 > > 2 thrown. Sum: 4 > > 6 thrown. Sum: 10 > > One thrown. > > > > gosh> (my-test) > > One thrown. > > > > > > Explanation of "unfold": > > > > Function: unfold end-test key gen-next-seed seed :optional tail-gen > > > > (unfold zero? (lambda(n) (+ 800 n)) (lambda(n) (- n 1)) 7) > > ===> > > (807 806 805 804 803 802 801) > > > > (unfold zero? (lambda(n) (+ 800 n)) (lambda(n) (- n 1)) 7 > > (lambda(n) (list "The number" n "ended the unfolding."))) > > ===> > > (807 806 805 804 803 802 801 "The number" 0 "ended the unfolding.") > > Using "do" is a bit tricky, but the result is shorter. > > (define (my-test) > (do ((n #f (+ 1 (random-integer 6))) > (sum 0)) > ((eqv? 1 n) (print "One thrown.")) > (if n (print n " thrown. Sum: " (inc! sum n))))) It seems to me that "do*" is more appropriate for this, but this version is 2 characters longer! (define (my-test) (do* ((n #f (+ 1 (random-integer 6))) (sum 0 (+ n sum))) ((eqv? 1 n) (print "One thrown.")) (if n (print n " thrown. Sum: " sum)))) I don't know why Common Lisp has "do*", but Gauche, Racket, and Chicken Scheme don't. Here's a version that I cobbled together. (A macro guru may give us a better one.) "do" is to "do*" as "let" is to "let*". (define-syntax do*-aux (syntax-rules () [(do* (inits ...) ((var update) ...) (test expr ...) stuff ...) (let* (inits ...) (if test (begin expr ...) (begin (begin stuff ...) (let loop () (begin (set! var update) ...) (if test (begin expr ...) (begin stuff ... (loop)))))))])) (define-syntax do* (syntax-rules (!!!) [(do* !!! (inits ...) (updates ...) ((var init update) more ...) until body ...) (do* !!! (inits ... (var init)) (updates ... (var update)) (more ...) until body ...)] [(do* !!! (inits ...) (updates ...) ((var init) more ...) until body ...) (do* !!! (inits ... (var init)) (updates ... ) (more ...) until body ...)] [(do* !!! inits updates () until body ...) (do*-aux inits updates until body ...)] [(do* inits-updates until stuff ...) (do* !!! () () inits-updates until stuff ...)])) (do* ((x 0 (+ 1 x)) (y 922)) ((= 9 x) (print 'ok)) (print x " " y)) 0 922 1 922 2 922 3 922 4 922 5 922 6 922 7 922 8 922 ok