Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH ---
 Richard proves that he is clueless
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 21:09:53 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <v62bth$1s632$7@dont-email.me>
References: <v4vrfg$2793f$1@dont-email.me> <v5pp9m$2jk8$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5rcrh$fkks$1@dont-email.me> <v5s44b$jvgt$2@dont-email.me>
 <v5tp2t$vsqr$1@dont-email.me> <v5u97g$12udb$6@dont-email.me>
 <v5vi62$1oanb$3@i2pn2.org> <v5vljj$1b0k9$3@dont-email.me>
 <v5vocu$1oanb$10@i2pn2.org> <v5vp03$1fbi8$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5vpht$1oana$8@i2pn2.org> <v5vrac$1fg22$2@dont-email.me>
 <v5vrnq$1oana$10@i2pn2.org> <v5vsff$1fqfa$2@dont-email.me>
 <e9c681b90a30f1c1c0b14c970675c5d6b104f535@i2pn2.org>
 <v60se2$1kr1q$5@dont-email.me>
 <04db95a103cfbcb76bd6082752ed89932cfce5d5@i2pn2.org>
 <v620nf$1qutj$1@dont-email.me>
 <adab42d299905f4219330596cccb5184f5e09597@i2pn2.org>
 <v621b9$1qutj$3@dont-email.me>
 <95b8d2686a17a5fee6b5811ca115c902fbc7b17a@i2pn2.org>
 <v629fd$1s632$2@dont-email.me>
 <c6747d2097a1946c7ebbe140882831375219deea@i2pn2.org>
 <v62aa6$1s632$4@dont-email.me>
 <5b7927d3326970682c6165aa8d2b4bccee65df37@i2pn2.org>
 <v62b0t$1s632$5@dont-email.me>
 <f0b106f793e07d23ba6ac455dc795552de5a6d73@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 04:09:54 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="29a678b7ecb7074967021c8dcb9f1179";
	logging-data="1972322"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/wwPssZMUKIAxHyGIS5J3m"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PX3h+t77AmuXLJnfwuEWVrD+lYk=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <f0b106f793e07d23ba6ac455dc795552de5a6d73@i2pn2.org>

On 7/2/2024 8:59 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 7/2/24 9:54 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 7/2/2024 8:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 7/2/24 9:42 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The Tarski proof directly provides the detailed inference steps.
>>>> So it is not that I do under understand the Gödel proof it is that
>>>> this proof is opaque completely hiding all of the important details.
>>>
>>> No, you miss the fact that you are starting in the MIDDLE of an 
>>> arguement, and that what you are thinking as a assumption is a proven 
>>> statement (which you don't understand)
>>>
>>
>> You can't correct my error because you know that you have no 
>> understanding of the Tarski proof. It is the same tactic as
>> always dishonestly deflect rather than make any attempt to
>> correct to hide the fact that you are clueless.
>>
>>
> 
> Nope, I WON'T correct your error, because you have proved yourself to be 
> a LIAR.
> 
You just proved that you are clueless.

> I have explained it in the past, but you will not listen, because you 
> have brainwashed yourself into beliving your own lies
> 
> Until you either provide the Diagonalization proof you said you had, or 

*I never freaking said that I freaking had this*

I know that it does prove that G is unprovable yet is
horse shit because it totally hides why G is unprovable.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer