Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Brett <ggtgp@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 20:58:32 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <vbahln$3vpif$1@dont-email.me>
References: <2024Aug30.161204@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
 <memo.20240830164247.19028y@jgd.cix.co.uk>
 <vasruo$id3b$1@dont-email.me>
 <2024Aug30.195831@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
 <vat5ap$jthk$2@dont-email.me>
 <vaunhb$vckc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vautmu$vr5r$1@dont-email.me>
 <2024Aug31.170347@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
 <vavpnh$13tj0$2@dont-email.me>
 <vb00c2$150ia$1@dont-email.me>
 <505954890d8461c1f4082b1beecd453c@www.novabbs.org>
 <vb0kh2$12ukk$1@dont-email.me>
 <vb3smg$1ta6s$1@dont-email.me>
 <vb4q5o$12ukk$3@dont-email.me>
 <vb6a16$38aj5$1@dont-email.me>
 <jwv8qw8o7zg.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org>
 <vb85a3$3gq7e$2@dont-email.me>
 <vbaf4s$3vcq1$1@dont-email.me>
 <e869564c7aec3d40d2ac8b5aa003cef4@www.novabbs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 22:58:32 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="52660b53d8db5606ea919c2700602f9d";
	logging-data="4187727"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/C87LsnoCaPj+sIRjO0yg6"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HT/8bjksipazDyGfRS+JEKcDvo4=
	sha1:pkGmuFUTgOY4P5Fu5Wo7UbjVC4k=
Bytes: 2930

MitchAlsup1 <mitchalsup@aol.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Sep 2024 20:15:24 +0000, Brett wrote:
> 
>> David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:
>>> On 03/09/2024 21:28, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>>>> My impression - based on hearsay for Rust as I have no experience - is
>>>>> that
>>>>> the key point of Rust is memory "safety".  I use scare-quotes here,
>>>>> since it
>>>>> is simply about correct use of dynamic memory and buffers.
>>>>> 
>>>>> It is entirely possible to have correct use of memory in C,
>>>> 
>>>> If you look at the evolution of programming languages, "higher-level"
>>>> doesn't mean "you can do more stuff".  On the contrary, making
>>>> a language "higher-level" means deciding what it is we want to make
>>>> harder or even impossible.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Agreed.
>>> 
>>> I've heard it said that the power of a programming language comes not
>>> from what you can do with the language, but from what you cannot do.
>> 
>> Wrong, the last version of Swift added all the garbage programming
>> concepts
>> that one should avoid.
>> 
>> You have to give people the tools to do anything.
> 
> It is impossible to create a computer programming language where
> the programmer cannot shoot himself in the foot.

https://www-users.york.ac.uk/~ss44/joke/foot.htm