Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: undroidwish Newsgroups: comp.lang.tcl Subject: Re: tcl versa python regarding performance Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 06:27:22 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 06:27:23 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3c1efcc4fcc4c49e50dd8bf6eef17106"; logging-data="1889489"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/RDM5Kga4ordemCG07IbfEiLGSuWmeynw=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:BQVZdyKOl3P+W8jM9RYzRxxFOKM= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 1949 On 8/16/24 22:19, aotto1968 wrote: > ... > these two pictures are generated by the tool and not by me… > -> the TCL picture is so "wide" because the TCL uses a lot of "overhead" > -> the python picture is so "narrow" because PYTHON uses much less > "overhead". Hmm, so here we are: a) you complain about Tcl's bad performance b) you seem to be unwilling to disclose enough information about the Python and Tcl implementations in order to get the big picture and see the cause of differences and to try to discuss improvements with you c) due to b) you continue to complain about Tcl's bad performance Not quite a fruitful cycle.