Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 19:23:10 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 11 Message-ID: <87ed69crn5.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> References: <86o75d1ktx.fsf@linuxsc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 04:23:10 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1017e97994ee365b6a0a4b9b05fc05d0"; logging-data="3496974"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX180nP1kB4zNSRl9nSE3uQGN" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:sZN7wWOqfuLweE5pd2j2RSTUxPo= sha1:rq0D2boJnaxN7g0YjNDRe2ZS/zM= Bytes: 1527 Tim Rentsch writes: [...] > Not exactly. There are things that can be done inside a > statement-expression that are not available inside nested > functions or lambdas. And you're not going to tell us what those things are. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */