Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 16:56:44 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <5d7b0659450f58aec28d4f49b1b59982cedfc694@i2pn2.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 16:56:44 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="966278"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2415 Lines: 30 Am Thu, 05 Sep 2024 11:52:04 -0500 schrieb olcott: > On 9/5/2024 11:34 AM, joes wrote: >> Am Thu, 05 Sep 2024 11:10:40 -0500 schrieb olcott: >>> On 9/5/2024 10:57 AM, joes wrote: >>>> Am Thu, 05 Sep 2024 08:24:20 -0500 schrieb olcott: >>>>> On 9/5/2024 2:34 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>> On 2024-09-03 13:00:50 +0000, olcott said: >>>>>>> On 9/3/2024 5:25 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2024-09-02 16:38:03 +0000, olcott said: >> >>>>> Show the details of how DDD emulated by HHH reaches its own machine >>>>> address 0000217f. >>>> By HHH returning, which we are guaranteed from its definition as a >>>> decider. >>> How the F--- Does the emulated HHH return? >> I don’t know, you claim it’s a decider! > You KEEP TRYING TO CHEAT by erasing the context !!! It is very well known by this point. > DDD emulated by HHH CANNOT POSSIBLY reach its own machine address > 0000217f. Only HHH can’t simulate it. > The directly executed HHH correctly determines that its emulated DDD > must be aborted because DDD keeps *THE EMULATED HHH* stuck in recursive > emulation. Why doesn’t the simulated HHH abort? -- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math: It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.