Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Janis Papanagnou Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Other programming languages (Was: Command line globber/tokenizer library for C?) Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:59:01 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:59:01 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="648aad9f1eaa4c7f3f5ed6a7d6a50c92"; logging-data="354228"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19XeFTajJHI1PekSqILKrdU" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:6DwTbkhdakjeBQ6wOP4Y8qoVBDE= In-Reply-To: Bytes: 1999 On 12.09.2024 17:48, Bonita Montero wrote: > Am 12.09.2024 um 17:40 schrieb Janis Papanagnou: > >> Programming C++ with only a "C" mindset I'd not consider advisable. >> That's what I've generally observed; with sole knowledge of X there >> seems to be an impetus and preference to infer those techniques to >> programming in Y. A lot of early C++ programs I've seen were just, >> umm, "enhanced" "C" programs. > > I'm using most new language facilities, but the mindset is still the same. You already said that in your previous posting. See my reply in my response to that post. Janis