Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: Extensive article on Rivendell and Grant Petersen
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 11:13:29 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <vcukup$37v5r$5@dont-email.me>
References: <IbWHO.21156$MxR.18519@fx47.iad> <vcpiki$29eeg$1@dont-email.me>
 <vcpu65$2ausd$2@dont-email.me> <vcqif4$2hoq2$1@dont-email.me>
 <VEfIO.1095856$azJ4.449168@fx16.ams4> <vcsa02$2q622$1@dont-email.me>
 <boc3fjlebcqkp6iefao8a13js0nbj8gu50@4ax.com>
 <hqjIO.327263$hKDf.37988@fx07.ams4>
 <l2h3fjdkfie6ht4dscca6n3ulq7thv0l0k@4ax.com> <vcsipj$2rfcq$2@dont-email.me>
 <blm3fj1rj43cu4465m83on9pq3ul18ir0p@4ax.com> <vcsmlk$2s44j$1@dont-email.me>
 <vct3ic$2tr2a$1@dont-email.me> <sls4fj914qnt9is0crvsd4dpli978v8ebt@4ax.com>
Reply-To: frkrygow@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 17:13:29 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9c65e914804687ac337fb7fda3f4798f";
	logging-data="3407035"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+TpsG/ykQeiDj7rdRY94dD1KgDIgupnuM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YBkKrlnydZKVDGzqqLrQAYSGWGU=
In-Reply-To: <sls4fj914qnt9is0crvsd4dpli978v8ebt@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2796

On 9/24/2024 4:08 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 21:10:36 -0400, Frank Krygowski
> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 9/23/2024 5:30 PM, AMuzi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes they do [want to win], else there's no (or at least less) recompense.
>>>
>>> Which would mean modern hydraulic systems for descents certainly, the
>>> skimpiest lightest calipers (and lighter non-disc wheels) for TT and
>>> ascent stages. For most rolling road stages it makes no significant
>>> difference.
>>
>> The "no significant difference" idea baffles a lot of people.
> 
> The "different personal preferences" baffles a lot of people.
> 
> The "I don't need to justify my personal preferences" idea is far
> beyond some people's comprehension. 

Nobody _has_ to justify their personal preferences. And certainly, 
nobody has to read others' justifications for their personal preferences.

But if a person doesn't find such _discussion_ interesting, perhaps they 
should find something else to do, other than reading a group devoted to 
such _disussions_.

How weird to spend so much time in a forum whose very purpose makes you 
angry!

-- 
- Frank Krygowski