Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John B. Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Colnago C60 Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 12:06:01 +0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 111 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 07:06:04 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d268afa39d63980d613847388e1473de"; logging-data="2804820"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19nnW1tj8N80HKeU4ZEMPyoJdMJkJOUh3k=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212 Cancel-Lock: sha1:4nL9KCM0p377ozb5A4ubSakx8JM= Bytes: 5441 On Fri, 02 Aug 2024 04:06:04 GMT, Tom Kunich wrote: >On Fri Aug 2 07:39:10 2024 John B. wrote: >> On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 21:27:36 GMT, Tom Kunich >> wrote: >> >> >On Thu Aug 1 09:10:38 2024 Jeff Liebermann wrote: >> >> On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 08:50:05 -0700, Jeff Liebermann >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 15:10:34 GMT, Tom Kunich >> >> >wrote: >> >> >>Facebook cancelled my account because ... >> >> >> >> "What Does a Deactivated Facebook Account Look Like" >> >> >> >> "A deactivated account has no profile photo". >> >> >> >> Tom, your account shows a profile photo. >> >> >> >> Therefore, your current Facebook account, with all the photos, has not >> >> been deactivated. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com >> >> PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com >> >> Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272 >> >> Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >That must be why I get: >> > >> >"No Search Results >> >Your search did not return any results. Please try again with other information. >> > >> > >> >Please enter your email or mobile number to search for your account." >> >When I try to sign on >> >Apparently you missed the posting where Facebook required me to allow being >> centured if some "fact checker" disagreed with my posting. When I >> showed their "factchecker" to be wrong almost 100% of the time they >> immediately closed my account. Apparently they stand behind their fact >> checker saying that the Pfizer vaccine is safe and effective even >> though it is now banned in GB and most of Europe. But then you think >> >> And Tommy strikes out yet again.See >> https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-covid-pandemic-vaccine-uk-britain-324766934158 >> (Published 3:02 AM GMT+7, January 28, 2023) >> -- >> Cheers, >> >> John B. >> > > > > >You really need to learn to read English. You've been in Thailand so long you forget your own native language. Really? You wrote - above "the Pfizer vaccine is safe and effective even though it is now banned in GB" Then I posted https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-covid-pandemic-vaccine-uk-britain-324766934158 Which says in part UK not banning COVID-19 vaccines for people under 50 And goes on to say CLAIM: The United Kingdom is banning anyone under the age of 50 from getting COVID-19 vaccines. AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. While the country will stop widely providing the vaccine to those under 50 next month, anyone deemed to have a clinical need, such as those at risk of severe illness, as well as frontline healthcare workers and caregivers, will still be able to get the shot. .... But the UK isn't preventing anyone under the age of 50 from getting the shot if it's medically necessary, stressed Shaun Whelan, a spokesperson for the UK Health Security Agency, which oversees public health and infectious disease response. Nursing and care home staff, social workers, homecare givers and other frontline workers will also still be eligible for a COVID vaccine, as will anyone who lives with someone who is immunosuppressed, the agency said. And the policy change isn't a reflection of concerns about the safety of COVID vaccines, as some social media users claim, Whelan wrote in an email Thursday. It's about using national healthcare resources effectively, as demand for vaccinations among those under the age of 50 is dropping off significantly. “Definitely not being banned. That's just nonsense,” Whelan wrote. “Completely misleading/inaccurate to say boosters are being banned.” Is that enough English for you? Tommy, your every post demonstrates, more and more, your lack of knowledge. Maybe you should change your title too "Stupid Old Tommy " -- Cheers, John B.