Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 22:10:52 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <defa840bbd5c8eceb9bd5f3c8831761109d99e83@i2pn2.org>
References: <vb0lj5$1c1kh$1@dont-email.me> <vb1o9g$1g7lq$1@dont-email.me>
 <vb3t1j$22k1l$1@dont-email.me> <vb4aq6$2r7ok$1@dont-email.me>
 <vb6p9v$3aebo$1@dont-email.me> <vb70k8$3b4ub$2@dont-email.me>
 <vbepsc$q8v6$1@dont-email.me> <vbes94$punj$12@dont-email.me>
 <24f85bcd40f57685aab93d45f15501178e526d0f@i2pn2.org>
 <vbh3td$1a0lq$1@dont-email.me> <vbnbps$2g6vo$2@dont-email.me>
 <vbp3r5$2svm1$1@dont-email.me> <vbphp9$2vfau$4@dont-email.me>
 <vbrg7v$3fphv$1@dont-email.me> <vbs1nf$3im2p$11@dont-email.me>
 <vbuafl$62lo$1@dont-email.me> <vc03vn$grkl$3@dont-email.me>
 <vc0sc2$p3ah$1@dont-email.me> <vc4v6l$1ma6t$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 02:10:52 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2097785"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <vc4v6l$1ma6t$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2582
Lines: 36

On 9/14/24 5:28 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 9/13/2024 3:16 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-09-13 01:19:51 +0000, olcott said:
>>
>>> On 9/12/2024 3:58 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2024-09-11 12:16:46 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/11/2024 2:18 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who allows the question but not the correct answer? You?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The expressivity of language allows this.
>>>>
>>>> Depends on the language. The formal language of the first order Peano
>>>> arithmetic does not allow questions.
>>>
>>> I am always assuming a language that is at least
>>> as expressive as formalized English.
>>
>> That does not mean anything without specification of which formalization
>> of Enslish. 
> 
> WHY THE HELL WOULD YOU ASSUME THAT I DON'T MEAN ALL OF IT?

Obviously, you don't understand the question, because you don't 
understand the problem.

There isn't an "All" that can apply.

> 
>> One can say that the procedure division of a COBOL program is
>> fromalized Ensglish but its expressive power is very limited.
>>
> 
>