Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: This makes all Analytic(Olcott) truth computable
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 07:12:48 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <v9sog0$2c67u$8@dont-email.me>
References: <v86olp$5km4$1@dont-email.me> <v8a4vf$uhll$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8aqh7$11ivs$1@dont-email.me> <v8cr4g$1gk19$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8dinp$1kii7$1@dont-email.me> <v8hv72$2mmsq$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8iisj$2qetj$1@dont-email.me> <v8kuhb$3d5q8$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8lc7p$3f6vr$2@dont-email.me> <v8naa8$3uo7s$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8nqo7$1n09$1@dont-email.me> <v8sm9o$1gk42$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8t2fl$1ilg6$2@dont-email.me> <v8v97m$2cofk$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8vusp$32fso$16@dont-email.me> <v91p95$3ppav$1@dont-email.me>
 <v92q4f$37e9$1@dont-email.me> <v94l1p$ldq7$1@dont-email.me>
 <v95c2j$p5rb$4@dont-email.me> <v95cke$p5rb$5@dont-email.me>
 <v977fo$gsru$1@dont-email.me> <v97goj$ielu$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9c93e$35sg6$1@dont-email.me> <v9d3k1$3ajip$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9ffpr$3s45o$1@dont-email.me> <v9fkd4$3se8c$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9kg66$tdvb$1@dont-email.me> <v9nbjf$1dj8q$1@dont-email.me>
 <20b1dea98eda49e74e822c96b37565bb3eb36013@i2pn2.org>
 <v9o4p2$1h5u4$1@dont-email.me> <v9shii$2bmob$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 14:12:49 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="126bd7503554732891ee2e704ffb1b5d";
	logging-data="2496766"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/SR1tmE2yn+DyuxTlUhmQZ"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tOUnUTHIADlU4XvC7tyaQyF6XRw=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v9shii$2bmob$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3317

On 8/18/2024 5:14 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-08-16 18:11:46 +0000, olcott said:
> 
>> On 8/16/2024 11:32 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 8/16/24 7:02 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>
>>>> *This abolishes the notion of undecidability*
>>>> As with all math and logic we have expressions of language
>>>> that are true on the basis of their meaning expressed
>>>> in this same language. Unless expression x has a connection
>>>> (through a sequence of true preserving operations) in system
>>>> F to its semantic meanings expressed in language L of F
>>>> x is simply untrue in F.
>>>
>>> But you clearly don't understand the meaning of "undecidability"
>>
>> Not at all. I am doing the same sort thing that ZFC
>> did to conquer Russell's Paradox.
> 
> Zermelo constructed a new formal theory that does not have that paradox.
> Note that the paradox was not present in Cantor's original theory as
> Cantor did not promise that Russell's set exists. But Cantor's original
> presentation was not fully formal so it was not clear that Russell's
> set does not exist.
> 

I am redefining the notion of a formal system to get
rid of undecidability. This requires few changes.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer