Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: [article] Doctor Who: Has the Disney Gamble Paid Off? Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 19:29:31 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 38 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 11:29:30 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="065581322bc2dac0334aa674a1b94c1a"; logging-data="1037317"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+jRKxS73Iv3BYOKh2pLSdfm5fiEOEjkSI=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:0FsyaD6KxSAOPtGyQ63J2hU+1Tw= In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2798 Hornplayer9599 wrote on 30/7/24 12:05 pm: > On 7/29/2024 11:58, Blueshirt wrote: >> solar penguin wrote: >>> The idiot insisted: >>>> In article , Blueshirt >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Science 1 Bible 0 >>>> >>>> Wrongo boyo! Science is sunbject to the bible. >>> >>> In that case, please show us where in the Bible we can find >>> Newton’s Second Law of Motion and the chemical formula for >>> ammonia. >> >> Stop! Dave was repeatedly asked by people here to provide a >> chapter/verse to back-up one of his infamous biblical claims a >> couple of months ago. We are still waiting for the relevant >> reference point. That man hasn't a clue about the bible. >> >> I know more about his bible than he does and I'm a fucking >> Atheist! > > And the more I hear Dave misquote, and misrepresent what is actually > in the Bible (and WHERE in the Bible things are), the more I'm > convinced that he's one of these self-ordained nutcases who really > doesn't know the Bible, and just warps scripture in any shape he > needs it to be in in order to suit his needs at the moment; That would be reasonable .... if he were making MONEY from it .... but I very much doubt that that is the case!! > that's why he can't defend what he says, and tries to deflect and > change the subject. As a Christian, that irritates me. > Yeap!! Yeap! Yeap. -- Daniel