Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: [article] Doctor Who: Has the Disney Gamble Paid Off? Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 20:12:35 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 54 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 12:12:34 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="25da4799ffb370f93f60eb35c2afafb5"; logging-data="3520951"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+VJHvyueFOivBi3Jr9HVWjHQAzasldCOQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:vvJEeg1SJSjJ3MdFWOdxvUMnj3g= In-Reply-To: Bytes: 3158 The Doctor wrote on 27/7/24 7:43 am: > In article , Daniel70 > wrote: >> The Doctor wrote on 26/7/24 10:03 pm: >>> In article , Daniel70 >>> wrote: >>>> The Doctor wrote on 25/7/24 10:48 pm: >>>>> In article , Daniel70 >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 24/7/24 11:53 pm: >>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>> Hornplayer9599 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/24/2024 05:07, Daniel70 wrote: >>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 24/7/24 12:08 am: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> SO where is the original article? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Go back up-thread and YOU'LL find the link, >>>>>>>>> Gobble-de-gook! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He can't do that. Remember, Gobble-de-gook is >>>>>>>> incapable of setting up his newsreader to thread posts. >>>>>>>> That's why he never trims his replies to only include >>>>>>>> the relevant text...it's the only way he can see the >>>>>>>> conversation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As i said, dannyboy is too lazy. >>>>>> >>>>>> I CAN'T HEAR YOU, Gobble-de-gook, so I've got ZERO idea >>>>>> what YOU, Gobble-de-gook, said!! >>>>>> >>>>>> And WHY does it matter if I am lazy (or NOT) when it is >>>>>> YOU, Gobble-de-gook, that wants to look something or other >>>>>> up?? >>>>> >>>>> You did not look up the original article yurself Dannyboy! >>>> >>>> Oh!! Didn't I, Gobble-de-gook?? >>>> >>>> I think I actually did, Gobble-de-gook, ABOUT A WEEK AGO, when >>>> Blueshirt posted the original post, Gobble-de-gook!! >>> >>> And what did it say? >> >> Don't take MY word for the content, Gobble-de-gook, look it up >> YOURSELF!! > > You are the one who said it. LIAR. Gobble-de-gook. The OP in this thread was made by Blueshirt, Gobble-de-gook. -- Daniel