Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: jdnicoll@panix.com (James Nicoll)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: Today's interesting development
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 00:40:07 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Public Access Networks Corp.
Message-ID: <v81fl7$dkr$1@reader1.panix.com>
References: <v7mdqf$je7$1@panix2.panix.com> <v7olas$dc9$1@reader1.panix.com> <v7oomt$ha9$1@reader1.panix.com> <v813so$30j1r$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 00:40:07 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix2.panix.com:166.84.1.2";
	logging-data="13979"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Bytes: 2776
Lines: 48

In article <v813so$30j1r$1@dont-email.me>,
Robert Carnegie  <rja.carnegie@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 23/07/2024 18:19, James Nicoll wrote:
>> In article <v7olas$dc9$1@reader1.panix.com>,
>> James Nicoll <jdnicoll@panix.com> wrote:
>>> In article <v7okdl$197vv$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> Ahasuerus  <ahasuerus@email.com> wrote:
>>>> On 7/22/2024 9:19 PM, James Nicoll wrote:
>>>>> In article <v7mr1t$s1a5$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> Ahasuerus  <ahasuerus@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/22/2024 4:01 PM, James Nicoll wrote:
>>>>>>> Someone spent $19,000 dollars to stuff the Hugo Award ballot
>>>>>>> box in a way that seems either very, very ineptly or in a
>>>>>>> manner calculated to be spotted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://glasgow2024.org/hugo-awards/statement-22-july-2024/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now, I do recall a case in the 1980s, I think, where an exuberant
>>>>>>> fan tried to buy a story he liked a Hugo, using consecutively
>>>>>>> numbered traveller's checks to buy memberships. So people do
>>>>>>> fuck up comprehensively. But it could also be someone really dislikes
>>>>>>> Finalist A and wanted to make them look bad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or -- conceivably -- someone who dislikes the Hugo award as an
>institution.
>>>>>
>>>>> What a half-assed attack, then.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps it was more along the lines of George Bernard Shaw's dictum
>>>> about wrestling with pigs:
>>>>
>>>> "You both get dirty and the pig likes it."
>>>>
>>>> Or "If we throw enough mud at the wall some of it will stick".
>>>>
>>> Just at this second, it looks like it might be SF's version of the
>>> Black Sox Scandal.
>>>
>> Which is to say, some gambler dropped 20K trying to fix a contest on
>> which he was voting.
>
>And/or betting?

One assumes. 
-- 
My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/
My tor pieces at https://www.tor.com/author/james-davis-nicoll/
My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/
My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll