Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Catrike Ryder Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Some bicycle paths... Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 07:17:08 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <9bdt9jpjs0ioq8ip18o0nd10mlon5akhse@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 13:17:10 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4f46028e00a63770afb4a69cfcf2ba48"; logging-data="2383870"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19gc33bJ1tT3cykFvMEyutAxK9LjlN4Ib8=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:pSBYTzc6kP9sqO5O8RzTDcUVOcI= Bytes: 2346 On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 20:59:58 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote: >The guns I argue against are absolutely designed to kill people. No more than any other gun, and handguns kill far more people than the guns you argue against. >I'm >saying their detriments to society greatly outweigh their non-existent >practical benefits. Apparently, nobody cares what you're saying. > I note that nobody here has yet posted a practical >benefit for such guns in civilian hands. And I note that you, John, >apparently do not own an AR-style rifle. That means you judge the >detriments of owning an AR-style rifle outweigh any practical benefits. Krygowski needs to make every argument personal. That's so he can attack the person rather than the issue. >And you're doing just fine without one. Most people are doing fine without a bicycle, too, yet they probably wouldn't argue against doing away with them.