Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: What "forms" of 2FA is Apple requiring for all new Apple IDs? Date: 3 Sep 2024 17:24:11 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: X-Trace: individual.net 0JkFU2Jbibmbh0HDneAbTgvhjI+8V/rd4KYPHYwaBBjx2ofycO Cancel-Lock: sha1:f18ZTzSo7hvi8Xk7kd7NmywYaNE= sha256:m54zMV6l4+5/AQgxC3j5fzeOgU582BunGW2nGJ+eR80= Mail-Copies-To: nobody X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin) Bytes: 1556 On 2024-09-02, Isaac Montara wrote: > > Google controls its operating system just as Apple controls its OS. > And Google is not requiring MFV for use of their Android operating system. Your entire argument is based on a false narrative that 2FA is undesirable. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR