Message-ID: <66fb1dc4@news.ausics.net> From: not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) Subject: Re: Review of NNTP Server Listing (Request for Corrections) Newsgroups: news.admin.peering,news.admin.hierarchies,news.groups References: <66f9c76c@news.ausics.net> <66f9f87c$1@news.ausics.net> User-Agent: tin/2.0.1-20111224 ("Achenvoir") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.31 (i586)) NNTP-Posting-Host: news.ausics.net Date: 1 Oct 2024 07:53:09 +1000 Organization: Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net Lines: 26 X-Complaints: abuse@ausics.net Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.bbs.nz!news.ausics.net!not-for-mail Bytes: 1513 In news.groups noel wrote: > On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 07:32:28 +1000, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >> news.digitalmars.com > > ./nntp_get-article_test.pl news.digitalmars.com > NNTPERROR: 411 No such group news.admin.peering > NNTPERROR: 430 No such article > > > news.povray.org > ./nntp_get-article_test.pl news.povray.org > NNTPERROR: 411 no such news group > NNTPERROR: 430 no such article found Yeah last time (message ID <58bf2fd3797762301411b3ba2b4ad265$1@sybershock.com> ) he was looking to "include local niche sites that don't feed yet do allow public access", so I included those ones which don't carry Usenet groups. Did news.ausics.net go into a time-warp back to 2014 yesterday afternoon or was that just me? -- __ __ #_ < |\| |< _#