Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Joel Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Linux 6.11 Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 10:19:19 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 43 Message-ID: References: <17f74d50a832220a$1642$1111581$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <0iv1fjtmfn4se0l5iipluanomt80q69ca0@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 16:19:20 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bd7912adbafaac3bca6c2aac5682ed77"; logging-data="2890957"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/VrETMqXnodnpxktyQe+Tx8q5BjNABVO8=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:nXqMhQanXsEP+qJtnMn1bMdFQvk= OS: openSUSE Leap 15.6, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI Bytes: 2832 vallor wrote: >On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 01:37:32 -0400, Joel wrote in ><0iv1fjtmfn4se0l5iipluanomt80q69ca0@4ax.com>: >> vallor wrote: >>>On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:46:27 -0400, Joel wrote in >>>: >>>> DFS wrote: >>>>>On 9/22/2024 4:29 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> https://imgur.com/bAiSkLe >>>>> >>>>> Those are darn sharp, even when enlarged. >>>> >>>> See: https://i.imgur.com/bAiSkLe.png >>> >>>What is the point? >> >> Just that if you find the raw image, it's what DFS stated "when >> enlarged", the image as it first appears on your link's page is >> *shrunk*. > >That makes sense. (They are the same size on my screen, but >I use a 4K monitor.) I have one too, actually, but it may not appear quite the same depending on how the browser is configured, I guess. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.