Path: ...!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 20:31:06 +0000 Subject: Re: Linux 6.11 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy References: <17f74bee5b704c29$89$2754825$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <17f74d50a832220a$1642$1111581$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> From: % Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 13:30:58 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 240922-2, 2024-9-22), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Message-ID: Lines: 57 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-EgwOy+4O1sOBAzIPTl0ArJjdxnmffSSbtWiFgexKO4CTCSFGUZV8fnlStOmLR09MssT2dAdomQR/Sdx!23LOuIFNOP3+bP+5V92iefTNVP/fvxpAr01Sp1tZGR/RbXQYNdOzMM0xdxcI10Jyq+iy9bRiJ/h7 X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 3376 vallor wrote: > On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 17:34:05 +0000, Lester Thorpe wrote in > : > >> On 22 Sep 2024 16:59:13 GMT, vallor wrote: >> >> >>> Keep it. The screenshot shows a font that -- while less jaggy -- is >>> still jaggy. >>> >>> (My terminal emulator font is "Liberation Mono Regular" and looks >>> typeset.) >>> >>> >> Jaggy my fucking ass. > > Okay, so your fucking ass is jaggy too. > >> Your monitor must be FUBAR cheap Chinese junk. > > No, it's not. > >> >> The fonts are rendered using libfreetype and in cooledit they are the >> same quality as in any other application. > > Then why are they jaggy? > >> On my system Liberation is clear, crisp, and impeccable. > > I can't help it if you have no discernment. > > https://imgur.com/bAiSkLe > > That's what it should look like, not what you posted. > >> Your system must be total junk, or your eyeballs must be FUBAR. > > Your screenshot shows _less_ jaggies than the original screenshot > I saw, but yelling and shaking your fist at the clouds won't > change the sub-optimal anti-aliasing in the screenshot you posted. > >> Also remember: my assessment is worth far, far, far more than your >> warped opinions and fucked up perception. > > Everybody can see the flaws in your screenshot. You aren't > fooling anybody. > > BTW, if I were a suspicious person, I'd think you tried > to blur the screenshot to make the font look less jaggy. > Again, you're fooling nobody. > >> I MANGLE people who dare to doubt my phenomenal expertise. > > The only thing you mangle is your font. > and the upper area of his pants