Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.in-chemnitz.de!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Linux 6.11
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 20:41:19 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <6824fjhffn79vrgv4frd7vc868losst369@4ax.com>
References: <17f74d50a832220a$1642$1111581$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <ll8bvlFqp7pU1@mid.individual.net> <pan$2d7c7$6bbe7257$a3424ceb$3da5d5c0@gnu.rocks> <llb0n0F8ep2U2@mid.individual.net> <pan$def33$a213bc3c$8c953fcc$4965f138@gnu.rocks> <66f06abb$0$1291$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <pan$94d41$141fa781$36c5a29$1edd2d1b@gnu.rocks> <vcptrp$2auv3$4@dont-email.me> <vcq90p$2ctaa$2@dont-email.me> <vcqort$2igu7$2@dont-email.me> <vct11t$2tic0$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 02:41:20 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d3f6570f74db000edc80c7bb879be843";
	logging-data="3070479"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19mrCTmSbtouPB+XEnhWpIULm4HrdR6rac="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:AbpyqEGzLjkDwxIs02snJGOJYS4=
OS: openSUSE Leap 15.6, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI
Bytes: 2266

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 23:55:43 -0400, DFS wrote:
>
>> Total violation of the "Unix philosophy" ...
>
>Says a victim of a proprietary, opaque system that wouldn’t know 
>“philosophy” if it bit you on the bum.


He judges Linux harshly but defends M$'s abusive OS.  Just
dumbfoundingly ass-backward.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.