From: Lester Thorpe Subject: Re: Linux 6.11 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy References: <17f74bee5b704c29$89$2754825$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <17f74d50a832220a$1642$1111581$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 36 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.usenetexpress.com!not-for-mail Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 17:38:17 +0000 Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 17:38:17 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1532 Organization: UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetexpress.com Bytes: 1851 On 21 Sep 2024 16:53:09 GMT, vallor wrote: > > I just looked at Cooledit screen shots, and thought "ugh". > > The fonts are fugly, for one. > You are most likely looking at the obsolete versions of Cooledit. The latest version, 4.1.2 is located here: ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/apps/editors/X/cooledit/ There are no screenshots available. However, the 4.1.2 version uses the Google Notosans fonts for Unicode coverage. These fonts are not very attractive. But I have patched the source code to use the Liberation fonts which are very nice. Here is the result: https://i.postimg.cc/t4WRB6WX/cooledit.png Do you want the patch? I only provide my outstanding software patches, free of charge, to worthy individuals. -- Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.