Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
Date: 29 Jul 2024 23:39:58 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <lgqnidF5ej4U3@mid.individual.net>
References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <lg8ea1Fa94U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonlp4azqw16000@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <lga2k1F7uk8U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonrftb7hazk002@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v7olut$19iie$1@dont-email.me> <lga8vfF8qq0U3@mid.individual.net>
 <v7q9vj$1l9co$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7qn3b$2hg0$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lgcm26Fbd6U4@mid.individual.net>
 <v7rfko$18sp$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lgda8oF3c6aU3@mid.individual.net>
 <v7tiln$2g2b$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v7u2gu$2co3l$1@dont-email.me> <lgfmvgFee44U1@mid.individual.net>
 <v7uduv$11n1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v80bgk$2s7ns$1@dont-email.me>
 <v83f93$31ac$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v860er$1kea$1@dont-email.me> <v86141$j$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v87e4d$ckpm$1@dont-email.me>
 <v87u43$1kl6$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v88npo$j33d$8@dont-email.me>
X-Trace: individual.net EBu9qsW2u0306ADs6esBjwaCKCc35M3h3hqxySn/RXRu08xFaN
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4inppu/wSyvoTSVXpriu513YC/w= sha256:KJe7YMT/ftNJYDyFsDN857VcFsn4fssAz3bZIzN880k=
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM
 dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW<
 ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e
 up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin)
Bytes: 3450

On 2024-07-29, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> On 2024-07-29 04:23, Andrew wrote:
>> Chris wrote on Mon, 29 Jul 2024 06:50:53 -0000 (UTC) :
>> 
>>>> You not comprehending the difference between zero percent of Apple reports
>>>> versus zero total convictions is how I know you zealots own subnormal IQs.
>>>
>>> Not at all. My position hasn't changed. You, however, have had about three
>>> different positions on this thread and keep getting confused which one
>>> you're arguing for. lol.
>> 
>> Au contraire
>> 
>> Because I only think logically, my rather sensible position has never
>> changed, Chris, and the fact you "think" it has changed is simply that you
>> don't know the difference between the percentage of convictions based on
>> the number of reports, and the total number of convictions.
>> 
>> When you figure out that those two things are different, then (and only
>> then) will you realize I've maintained the same position throughout.
>> 
>> Specifically....
>> 
>> a. If the Apple reporting rate is low, and yet if their conviction
>>     rate is high (based on the number of reports), then they are NOT
>>     underreporting images.
>
> Apple's reporting rate is ZERO, because they're not doing scanning of 
> images of any kind.

It's zero for *photos*, but not for *email*:

<https://9to5mac.com/2021/08/23/apple-scans-icloud-mail-for-csam/>

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR