Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
Date: 24 Jul 2024 21:33:12 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <lgda8oF3c6aU3@mid.individual.net>
References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <lg8ea1Fa94U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonlp4azqw16000@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <lga2k1F7uk8U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonrftb7hazk002@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v7olut$19iie$1@dont-email.me> <lga8vfF8qq0U3@mid.individual.net>
 <v7q9vj$1l9co$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7qn3b$2hg0$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lgcm26Fbd6U4@mid.individual.net>
 <v7rfko$18sp$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
X-Trace: individual.net l//tfnOi6Bwon8lg8nS+Lg4NHcSlZ4er6LGyPgvPtFZnGlNx6x
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XiFLP5Stcru/NfpNMh95xcPxhrI= sha256:nSYK+A13rycoJcYk8Q+DIBeJvpOcK3ysHNjtNAeozp4=
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM
 dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW<
 ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e
 up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin)
Bytes: 2371

On 2024-07-24, Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:
> Jolly Roger wrote on 24 Jul 2024 15:48:22 GMT :
>
>>> For all that is in the news stories, it could be ZERO convictions
>>> resulted.
>> 
>> It's nowhere near zero.
>
> It's probably zero given it's the most important metric.

It's not zero. Not even close.

> Without convictions, the reporting of CSAM images is meaningless.

There have been plenty of convictions.

> The reason they didn't report it is likely because it's actually zero.

No.

>>> Is it worth everyone's loss of privacy for maybe zero gain in child
>>> safety?
>> 
>> Your right to privacy shouldn't be violated because someone else
>> might do something wrong.
>
> I agree with you.
>
> They get zero convictions.

That's a lie.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR