Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:40:14 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <v88une$k3p0$3@dont-email.me>
References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <lg8ea1Fa94U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonlp4azqw16000@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <lga2k1F7uk8U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonrftb7hazk002@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v7olut$19iie$1@dont-email.me> <lga8vfF8qq0U3@mid.individual.net>
 <v7q9vj$1l9co$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7qn3b$2hg0$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v7rclq$1r24r$2@dont-email.me> <lgdac6F3c6aU4@mid.individual.net>
 <v80bju$2s7ns$2@dont-email.me> <lgi05eFq6vhU2@mid.individual.net>
 <v80j93$2nqsm$5@dont-email.me> <lgildlFtal2U1@mid.individual.net>
 <v85r6s$mgr$1@dont-email.me> <lgni5gFl7shU3@mid.individual.net>
 <v87gf2$d1eu$1@dont-email.me> <lgpqjfF17veU1@mid.individual.net>
 <v88jf8$j1j9$1@dont-email.me> <v88sjt$hbk9$1@solani.org>
 <v88uk9$ksba$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 22:40:15 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3eb9958d5eea0c84948681d44f52d8dc";
	logging-data="659232"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/vbe/uggu4neABwem63mvuQ9LarAA9ss4="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FJER1A06FPCYHeZNDifXJ9wiGFc=
Content-Language: en-CA
In-Reply-To: <v88uk9$ksba$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2780

On 2024-07-29 13:38, Chris wrote:
> On 29/07/2024 21:04, badgolferman wrote:
>> Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-07-29, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Actually, a human being does review it with Google's system:
>>>
>>> I was unclear. I'm not saying a human doesn't review, I'm saying that 
>>> given
>>> the dozens/hundreds of images of suspected abuse images they review a 
>>> day
>>> they won't have the ability to make informed decisions.
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> A human content moderator for Google would have reviewed the photos
>>>> after they were flagged by the artificial intelligence to confirm they
>>>> met the federal definition of child sexual abuse material.
>>
>> What kind of a person would want this job?
> 
> I read an article a couple of years ago on the Facebook content 
> moderators. Many ended up traumatised and got no support. God it was a 
> grim read.

I think I recall that as well.