Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Moebius Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_There_is_a_first/smallest_integer_=28in_M=C3=BCcken?= =?UTF-8?Q?land=29?= Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 18:02:17 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <7mXj2D8kEhAscu3HLTqTUKsaj18@jntp> Reply-To: invalid@example.invalid MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 18:02:17 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c1c897a453f29bb80ea39d50f9318775"; logging-data="2010652"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18zOcD4G5RoY1Y9+vAfx7mR" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:oy2vvvEj26p1MHF7JOH/2stmmpY= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: de-DE Bytes: 2005 Am 17.07.2024 um 17:27 schrieb WM: > Le 17/07/2024 à 17:21, Moebius a écrit : >> Am 17.07.2024 um 17:08 schrieb WM: >> >>> There is a point where NUF is 0 >> >> Yes, for all points x <= 0. >> >>> and then it increases. >> >> No, it does not "increase", it _jumps_ "at" x = 0. MEANING: NUF(x) = 0 for all x e IR, x <= 0 and NUF(x) = aleph_0 for all x e IR, x > 0 . > [NFU(x) = aleph_0] at a point x requires [aleph_0] unit fractions at that > point x. It seems that you have forgotten your OWN definition of NUF, Mückenheim. No, it does not "require aleph_0 unit fractions at that point x" but aleph_0 unit fractions THAT ARE <= x. (Holy shit!) Hint: NFU(x) := |{u e {1/n : n e IN} : u <= x}|