Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Thomas Koenig Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: is Vax addressing sane today Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 19:44:40 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <2024Oct3.085754@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2024Oct4.170717@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> Injection-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 21:44:40 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="606cd1796f5c9ac7137f5100482c2d8b"; logging-data="373795"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+d6Cmyobj74aeitJboDu9ZAHdNNuPycow=" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:mEo80RDj1cwys9zCLXNNr+x4N6A= Bytes: 1413 Anton Ertl schrieb: > Alpha suffered before. The 21264 was late, and did not keep up in the > clock race. https://www.star.bnl.gov/public/daq/HARDWARE/21264_data_sheet.pdf gives the clock rate as varying between 466 and 600 MHz, and Wikipedia gives the clock frequency of the Pentium Pro as between 150 and 200 MHz. The Pentium II Overdrive, according to Wikipedia, had up to 333 MHz. Is this information wrong?