Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 17:02:12 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 02:02:13 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="98c6004928f46df0abe90729ccf8af51"; logging-data="3852329"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/zZltGXP5OsghhZ3VK3N3jUHXl2HVIMEc=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:VciL8iZlw6DJoJgbEgGaJ5g0lco= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2163 On 8/28/2024 4:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 8/28/24 8:57 AM, WM wrote: >> Le 28/08/2024 à 04:13, Richard Damon a écrit : >> >>> >>> Well NUF(x) does not exist, but that doesn't say that infinity is not >>> actual, >> >> So the unit fractions are actually existing but their number isn't? >> Strange! >> >> Regards, WM >> >> >> > > There number exists, it is aleph_0. > > You just can't count them from the "end" that doesn't have an end. For some damn reason I think WM thinks aleph_0 means a largest natural and/or smallest unit fraction. The hyper, really big finite type of thought? Humm... Any thoughts? ;^)