Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture =?UTF-8?B?ZGVzaWduZXI/?= Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 23:30:00 +0000 Organization: Rocksolid Light Message-ID: References: <2935676af968e40e7cad204d40cafdcf@www.novabbs.org> <20240929152159.000024a7@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="4070949"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="65wTazMNTleAJDh/pRqmKE7ADni/0wesT78+pyiDW8A"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$VIkSYRtt2O2c4qiqJCjTLehXclWGmR2p.gKQ1h.TyDwT3q/lK/pke X-Rslight-Posting-User: ac58ceb75ea22753186dae54d967fed894c3dce8 Bytes: 1406 Lines: 5 On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 18:26:39 +0000, Brett wrote: > > Four times the dram bandwidth, DIMMs are DOOMED. > They had a good long run.