Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not) Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 18:11:55 GMT Organization: Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien Lines: 10 Message-ID: <2024Oct5.201155@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> References: <550600971b1a36b4b630c496cb21b96b@www.novabbs.org> <0194054dac788f7e3a163726e84d72ac@www.novabbs.org> <2024Oct3.113903@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2024Oct4.193007@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> Injection-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 20:19:32 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4b486aea911af6f0cec786c98c1ac92e"; logging-data="885056"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX184P8LB5WyBTCuDujXTgRn7" Cancel-Lock: sha1:6O2FGPA2Kfa9LF0YoyxaslyyxJc= X-newsreader: xrn 10.11 Bytes: 1681 Brett writes: >Didn’t it take a decade for the 386 to get a 32 bit OS 386/ix appeared in 1985, exactly 0 years after the 386. Xenix/386 and Windows/386 appeared in 1987. - anton -- 'Anyone trying for "industrial quality" ISA should avoid undefined behavior.' Mitch Alsup,