Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Brett <ggtgp@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture designer?
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 04:01:56 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <vdd7rj$23l66$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vdc5po$1reaa$1@dont-email.me>
 <memo.20240929220910.19028c@jgd.cix.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 06:01:56 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8252464e8b61270114f4af0a4c529d78";
	logging-data="2217158"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/vyXTIoQy12iZzQ+o3G2oI"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SpogApJqj7rhuqTithacQtxi1KM=
	sha1:/DsQdG20344PeFJW0+Db7Jv+yaM=
Bytes: 1864

John Dallman <jgd@cix.co.uk> wrote:
> In article <vdc5po$1reaa$1@dont-email.me>, ggtgp@yahoo.com (Brett) wrote:
> 
>> Well then, Go take a look at the Structures Atom Model and tell me 
>> what you think.
>> 
>> https://structuredatom.org
> 
> It's a re-invention of the "nuclear electrons" idea that was current
> through the 1920s, and seems to have the same problems. 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_of_the_neutron#Problems_of_the_nu
> clear_electrons_hypothesis>
> 
> John 
> 

That is just another cloud model. SAM has actual structure that explains
attachment angles and should explain hyperfine structure properties better.

The hyperfine structure looks like just a collection of SWAG formulas, so
why should your atom model even matter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperfine_structure