Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Brett <ggtgp@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture designer?
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 19:58:46 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <vdevtm$2c7jg$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vcd3ds$3o6ae$2@dont-email.me>
 <2935676af968e40e7cad204d40cafdcf@www.novabbs.org>
 <2024Sep18.074007@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
 <vcds4i$3vato$1@dont-email.me>
 <2024Sep18.220953@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
 <vcfopr$8glq$3@dont-email.me>
 <ll232oFs6asU1@mid.individual.net>
 <vcgo74$gkr1$3@dont-email.me>
 <ll2n1hFu4lmU1@mid.individual.net>
 <vchu2q$mfu5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vchu67$mgk1$1@dont-email.me>
 <vcieqn$p8fv$1@dont-email.me>
 <AAfHO.23138$5837.19479@fx35.iad>
 <86jzf4829c.fsf@linuxsc.com>
 <vcpojl$2ads5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vct3av$2tic0$17@dont-email.me>
 <vctb0s$32gol$1@dont-email.me>
 <vctbo2$32cko$3@dont-email.me>
 <vcv711$3b4hf$1@dont-email.me>
 <vcvji5$3co45$7@dont-email.me>
 <20240925104320.00007791@yahoo.com>
 <vdaakm$1facd$4@dont-email.me>
 <vdacqq$1jf40$1@dont-email.me>
 <vdd6tv$23gqs$1@dont-email.me>
 <vdd8d6$23nsh$1@dont-email.me>
 <ee430ac27c829d5514d5652aa2c6fad6@www.novabbs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 21:58:47 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="122c6956210cd0e6ae41657e31d6e543";
	logging-data="2498160"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/GtSOXm0SCCOR9tAtIM2pO"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4DbgWS/prGKWyufF4tlIjHLtVsc=
	sha1:oHULQdGN/tCNfouTUQCxcpcBRo8=
Bytes: 2552

MitchAlsup1 <mitchalsup@aol.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 4:11:18 +0000, Brett wrote:
>> 
>> Based off of Hubble research 1000’s of theories were proposed to get a
>> Nobel prize, then the James Web telescope launched and all those
>> theories went into the toilet.
>> 
>> Had one of those theories been in the ball park you would have declared
>> success for predictive science. Ignoring the 999 failures, but
>> “science”completely failed.
> 
> just because there were thousands of conjectures that fail to meet the
> rigors of science does not mean that science has failed.

The false religion of “science” failed.

Yes real science actually advances this way.