Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Stephen Fuld" <SFuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: A different type of security vulnerability
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 17:52:50 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <v95l1i$2m0q1$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v95eog$pu8a$1@dont-email.me> <60819cad802348b1a3c11eb4f69b399f@www.novabbs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2024 19:52:51 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dc2828c405bf54d43deeaa9c164b175d";
	logging-data="2818881"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Ti7lf9ZcKHOnVCZzkVhkk+pX+wfSCP3o="
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4+ICqXt38yYOulUiFiKJ4RH24gY=
Bytes: 1321

MitchAlsup1 wrote:

> If only x86 chips came out of RESET with the MMUs
> already turned on.


Probably sufficient, but not necessary.  Apparently Intel chips are not
vulnerable to this particular atack.



-- 
 - Stephen Fuld 
(e-mail address disguised to prevent spam)