Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: FromTheRafters Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:15:17 -0400 Organization: Peripheral Visions Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: erratic.howard@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 16:15:24 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="70c76770dbf398a42c2672b19099b690"; logging-data="500751"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18dQTHVSoGfTZQFr2pNeW0CZ5x9iaxwfJg=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:BM3/JxadV+NhdlvvvaNH07IrLTc= X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb X-ICQ: 1701145376 Bytes: 1765 WM brought next idea : > Le 21/08/2024 à 18:21, FromTheRafters a écrit : >> WM used his keyboard to write : > >>> The other way round. There is an end, because at and below zero there is >>> no unit fraction. Therefore there is an end before. Simple as that. >> >> The "sequence" doesn't end. > > Then it must go on below zero. No it mustn't. > But it does not. As well it shouldn't.