Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 13:54:14 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <07d60bd0a63b903820013ae60792fb7a@www.novabbs.org> <898cf44224e9790b74a0269eddff095a@www.novabbs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 22:54:15 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="233a7ecb793af72ad112e5f4147874d3"; logging-data="3992620"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18cCrITG78XwURV3kWyhnhLbgY/Vr+qG6o=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:ysWvVbwx0W57T9xxpWGhhxdk42g= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 1876 On 9/11/2024 6:22 AM, jseigh wrote: > On 9/11/24 00:15, Paul A. Clayton wrote: >> On 9/9/24 3:14 AM, Terje Mathisen wrote: >>> jseigh wrote: [...] > In software there's a large body of lock-free data structures > using various deferred reclamation schemes, RCU, hazard pointers, > etc...  RCU has zero read access cost overhead, hazard pointers > have almost zero cost, about 3x the cost of a pipelined load. > Hazard pointers got a lot faster when need for a store/load memory > barrier was gotten rid of. Afaict, _you_ did that wrt your SMR+RCU hybrid, right? [...]