Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!earthli!nntp.terraraq.uk!.POSTED.tunnel.sfere.anjou.terraraq.org.uk!not-for-mail From: Richard Kettlewell Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet Subject: Re: Cancellation for excessive crossposting on "fr" hierarchy Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 09:00:08 +0100 Organization: terraraq NNTP server Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: innmantic.terraraq.uk; posting-host="tunnel.sfere.anjou.terraraq.org.uk:172.17.207.6"; logging-data="22483"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@innmantic.terraraq.uk" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:R6zd8a8F5rQvsCMmKRZFd0xIXt8= X-Face: h[Hh-7npe<v9!1Z&W?r\c.!4DXH5PWpga"ha +r0NzP?vnz:e/knOY)PI- X-Boydie: NO Bytes: 1707 Lines: 17 llp writes: > In other words, the "fr" hierarchy would impose its policy of > to all usenet ! > > I'd like to hear what you think: > - do the current deletions via a cancel message seem legitimate to > you? I think if you’re posting to multiple hierarchies then you get to follow the rules of all of those hierarchies simultaneously. > - would server administrators like to have spam-fr nocems for rules > specific to the "fr" hierarchy? Personally, don’t care. -- https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/