Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ben Bacarisse Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Baby X is bor nagain Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 16:00:50 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 25 Message-ID: <87bk3flty5.fsf@bsb.me.uk> References: <20240625113616.000075e0@yahoo.com> <87ed8jnbmf.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <20240627201830.854@kylheku.com> <87msn1l3e5.fsf@bsb.me.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 17:00:50 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b266bd3b753af90a68a6f95ab3ce5341"; logging-data="1774095"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+8aJwOfqgM4YIm9B5NsWwSCraATyAxKEc=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BYvxBPa0+4E0IGKy3gE3ivMY3SU= sha1:vFiga+sKp+LqGG8rHvKvzh8EYDQ= X-BSB-Auth: 1.0a4a2f6a651bedd559df.20240702160050BST.87bk3flty5.fsf@bsb.me.uk Bytes: 2397 bart writes: > On 01/07/2024 13:09, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >> bart writes: >> >>> Using products like tcc doesn't mean never using gcc. (Especially on Linux >>> where you will have it installed anyway.) >> The parenthetical remark is wrong. > > You mean it is possible for a Linux installation to not have gcc > preinstalled? I mean that saying "on Linux ... you will have it installed anyway" is wrong. > Sure, although in the dozen or two versions I've come across, it > always has been. I'm not sure what you mean by a "version". Every version (in the sense of release number) of a source-only Linux distribution will have gcc installed, but is that all you mean? Source-only distributions are rare and not widely used. -- Ben.