Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 22:47:49 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <587da3e402e13cc6f9a33d8df3d0a6a72946311f@i2pn2.org> References: <80289a46bd7b8eb0cf1ae23d71809bd6c0ae1f4a@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 02:47:49 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="771834"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2269 Lines: 22 On 9/3/24 7:29 AM, WM wrote: > On 03.09.2024 13:26, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 9/3/24 7:19 AM, WM wrote: > >>> No, it shows that no unit fractions exist unless a first one exists. > >> Sol you think that 1/1 doesn't exist? > > No, I know that 1/1 does not exist unless the smallest unit fraction > exists. > > Regards, WM > WHy? 1/1 BY DEFINITION exists. No smalllest unit fraction, BY DEFINITION exists. Thus, your logic, BY DEFIHITION doesn't actualy exists. Sorry, you just proved your brain exploded with your inconsistancy.