Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:15:08 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 55
Message-ID: <v5i0cs$2b1r9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v4vrfg$2793f$1@dont-email.me> <v59797$brmn$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5b7nv$qvrb$1@dont-email.me> <v5btf3$v0vb$4@dont-email.me>
 <v5chru$10816$1@i2pn2.org> <v5cn01$149dc$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5ebvr$1hs89$1@dont-email.me> <v5efod$1ikpr$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5ejau$1iq57$1@dont-email.me> <v5eup8$1lar1$2@dont-email.me>
 <v5gidq$221q3$1@dont-email.me> <v5h34g$24jbd$4@dont-email.me>
 <v5h5oq$1g3$1@news.muc.de> <v5h765$25q9l$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5he3t$1c0t$1@news.muc.de> <v5hfb8$26j79$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5hr0e$1c0t$2@news.muc.de> <v5hsjs$29tg1$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5hv8o$174q9$1@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 23:15:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="28c20839daaf0f4c95806d952d7f722b";
	logging-data="2459497"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19VuitYfqFXi9nRv32e4JX9"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0SkwmC4NtRHEoQ2sm4IFadROZVU=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v5hv8o$174q9$1@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 3880

On 6/26/2024 3:55 PM, joes wrote:
> Am Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:10:36 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>> On 6/26/2024 2:43 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>> Your posts are, in the main, tedious in the extreme.  When you repeat
>>> the same thing 30 times over, you can't expect anybody to read each of
>>> the repetitions as though it were fresh and new.
>> I must keep repeating them until they bother to pay attention to the
>> exact words that I am exactly saying because every fake rebuttal is the
>> strawman deception.
> That's not how it works. You should try to rephrase if you are not
> understood.
> A strawman is a misrepresentation. I think we understand you correctly,
> if at all.
> 
>>> All the people you are debating with care about the truth.  That's why
>>> they're in this group debating with you.
>> It seems to me that they are only here to play the troll.
> This made me laugh hysterically.
> 
>>> Anything "like" what an x86 emulator does is insufficiently precise.
>> An x86 emulator is already 100% perfectly precise if the trolls that
>> review my work don't think so then that proves that they are trolls.
> Then why do you think that emulator can abort or otherwise change the
> behaviour of its input?
> 
>>> And the "semantics of x86" don't specify anthing beyond the meaning of
>>> x86 programs in general.
>> *That is a stupid thing to say*
>> The semantics of the x86 language provides 100% of all of the details of
>> the behavior of these two functions.

> There is nothing that makes this specific to x86. (Also C is not asm.)
> 

Yes stupid this makes it 100% specific to the x86 language.

_DDD()
[00002172] 55               push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec             mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000       push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff       call 000015d2 ; call H0(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404           add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d               pop ebp
[00002183] c3               ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]

The call from DDD to H0(DDD) when DDD is correctly emulated
by x86 emulator H0 cannot possibly return.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer