Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Liar detector: Fred, Richard, Joes and Alan --- Ben's agreement
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 09:15:45 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <v70mih$61d8$3@dont-email.me>
References: <v644pn$29t4h$3@dont-email.me> <v694k4$3bevk$1@dont-email.me>
 <v69502$3bh3f$1@dont-email.me> <v6b1k4$3odj5$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6bf7r$3qiio$2@dont-email.me> <v6bm5v$3rj8n$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6bmoe$3ri0l$2@dont-email.me> <v6bnt2$3rj8n$3@dont-email.me>
 <v6brfj$3skuk$2@dont-email.me> <v6c3vh$3ttem$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6c539$3u2mj$1@dont-email.me> <v6dda0$7s8u$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6e67v$bbcb$4@dont-email.me> <v6gss2$t87a$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6gv65$to0m$1@dont-email.me> <v6h2li$ud7p$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6h2rm$ue7s$1@dont-email.me> <v6h3cu$ud7p$2@dont-email.me>
 <v6h83q$vag9$1@dont-email.me> <v6ikgb$19f5g$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6jgjo$1ctoi$4@dont-email.me> <v6lckp$1qi9e$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6m2qq$1tj30$6@dont-email.me>
 <60a1c2490e9bd9a5478fd173a20ed64d5eb158f9@i2pn2.org>
 <v6nvn8$2bn6q$1@dont-email.me> <v6oqti$2fuva$7@dont-email.me>
 <v6qn6k$2ubkt$1@dont-email.me> <v6r9q1$30qtt$5@dont-email.me>
 <v6tbge$3gegs$1@dont-email.me> <v6tqlm$3imib$5@dont-email.me>
 <v6vvid$24jd$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 16:15:46 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="315e0a3cec91d4c915c12e3bad83b2c9";
	logging-data="198056"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19BiV31t0/jEOBM4Dd/MYoY"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PoYqOzGvUzxBOn0rVDGheRZlwzI=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v6vvid$24jd$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 4320

On 7/14/2024 2:43 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-07-13 12:07:18 +0000, olcott said:
> 
>> On 7/13/2024 2:48 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2024-07-12 13:07:13 +0000, olcott said:
>>>
>>>> On 7/12/2024 2:49 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-07-11 14:40:50 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is a hierarchy of prerequisites of knowledge.
>>>>>> Before anyone can understand a simulating termination
>>>>>> analyzer based on an x86 emulator they must understand
>>>>>> (1) x86 emulation
>>>>>> (2) Termination Analysis.
>>>>>
>>>>> The order should be:
>>>>> (1) termination analysis and termination analyzer,
>>>>> (2) simulating termination analyzer,
>>>>> (3) x86,
>>>>> (4) x86 emulation,
>>>>> (5) simulating termination analyzer based on an x86 emulator.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *That order has proven to not work*
>>>> People are getting stuck on x86 emulation.
>>>
>>> In that case it is likely that no order that contains x86 emulation at
>>> any point will not work.
>>>
>>
>> I explained x86 emulation in terms of a C language interpreter
>> and the one detail of the x86 language that must be understood
>> (the function calling convention) so that C programmers can
>> understand the first half of my paper.
>>
>> Simulating Termination Analyzer H is Not Fooled by Pathological Input D
>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369971402_Simulating_Termination_Analyzer_H_is_Not_Fooled_by_Pathological_Input_D
>>
>> All of the rebuttals of my work remain anchored in disagreeing
>> with the x86 language, they have no other basis.
> 
> The main error in your atricle is lack of proofs (i.e., sequences of
> sentences that are either presented as assumtions or derived from
> earlier sentences in the proof with truth preserving transformations).
> In addtion, many of the defects already pointed out are still there.
> 

*You can comprehend this is a truism or fail to*
*comprehend it disagreement is necessarily incorrect*
Any input that must be aborted to prevent the non
termination of HHH necessarily specifies non-halting
behavior or it would never need to be aborted.

Disagreeing with the above is analogous to disagreeing
with arithmetic.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer