Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Liar detector: Fred, Richard, Joes and Alan --- Ben's agreement
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 07:07:18 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <v6tqlm$3imib$5@dont-email.me>
References: <v644pn$29t4h$3@dont-email.me> <v68tvd$3ac9t$1@dont-email.me>
 <v68uj0$3ahel$1@dont-email.me> <v694k4$3bevk$1@dont-email.me>
 <v69502$3bh3f$1@dont-email.me> <v6b1k4$3odj5$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6bf7r$3qiio$2@dont-email.me> <v6bm5v$3rj8n$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6bmoe$3ri0l$2@dont-email.me> <v6bnt2$3rj8n$3@dont-email.me>
 <v6brfj$3skuk$2@dont-email.me> <v6c3vh$3ttem$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6c539$3u2mj$1@dont-email.me> <v6dda0$7s8u$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6e67v$bbcb$4@dont-email.me> <v6gss2$t87a$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6gv65$to0m$1@dont-email.me> <v6h2li$ud7p$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6h2rm$ue7s$1@dont-email.me> <v6h3cu$ud7p$2@dont-email.me>
 <v6h83q$vag9$1@dont-email.me> <v6ikgb$19f5g$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6jgjo$1ctoi$4@dont-email.me> <v6lckp$1qi9e$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6m2qq$1tj30$6@dont-email.me>
 <60a1c2490e9bd9a5478fd173a20ed64d5eb158f9@i2pn2.org>
 <v6nvn8$2bn6q$1@dont-email.me> <v6oqti$2fuva$7@dont-email.me>
 <v6qn6k$2ubkt$1@dont-email.me> <v6r9q1$30qtt$5@dont-email.me>
 <v6tbge$3gegs$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 14:07:19 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="52398669a80ff5113c36343403a598c9";
	logging-data="3758667"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+8SFTpIC0P8VjulPHpnT4B"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:noyVhUn6a4tqa1xi5DvxQnHYOQY=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v6tbge$3gegs$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3857

On 7/13/2024 2:48 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-07-12 13:07:13 +0000, olcott said:
> 
>> On 7/12/2024 2:49 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2024-07-11 14:40:50 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>
>>>> It is a hierarchy of prerequisites of knowledge.
>>>> Before anyone can understand a simulating termination
>>>> analyzer based on an x86 emulator they must understand
>>>> (1) x86 emulation
>>>> (2) Termination Analysis.
>>>
>>> The order should be:
>>> (1) termination analysis and termination analyzer,
>>> (2) simulating termination analyzer,
>>> (3) x86,
>>> (4) x86 emulation,
>>> (5) simulating termination analyzer based on an x86 emulator.
>>>
>>
>> *That order has proven to not work*
>> People are getting stuck on x86 emulation.
> 
> In that case it is likely that no order that contains x86 emulation at
> any point will not work.
> 

I explained x86 emulation in terms of a C language interpreter
and the one detail of the x86 language that must be understood
(the function calling convention) so that C programmers can
understand the first half of my paper.

Simulating Termination Analyzer H is Not Fooled by Pathological Input D
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369971402_Simulating_Termination_Analyzer_H_is_Not_Fooled_by_Pathological_Input_D

All of the rebuttals of my work remain anchored in disagreeing
with the x86 language, they have no other basis.

*This proves that every rebuttal is wrong somewhere*
No DDD instance of each HHH/DDD pair of the infinite set of
every HHH/DDD pair ever reaches past its own machine address of
0000216b and halts thus proving that every HHH is correct to
reject its input DDD as non-halting.


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer