Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be
 willfully ignorant
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 10:33:25 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <v632cm$23ohm$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v5vkun$1b0k9$1@dont-email.me> <v60dci$1ib5p$1@dont-email.me>
 <v60red$1kr1q$2@dont-email.me> <v61hn7$1oec9$1@dont-email.me>
 <v61ipa$1og2o$2@dont-email.me> <v61jod$1oec9$2@dont-email.me>
 <v61leu$1p1uo$1@dont-email.me>
 <7b6a00827bfcc84e99e19a0d0ae6028ebcdc263c@i2pn2.org>
 <v620vu$1qutj$2@dont-email.me>
 <f6e8f5de9a1e61c7970a92145ce8c1f9087ba431@i2pn2.org>
 <v628ts$1s632$1@dont-email.me>
 <178edf6a7c5329df35a9af6852ecbd41c0948ea1@i2pn2.org>
 <v629mp$1s632$3@dont-email.me>
 <168858894febbaa529d1704ea864bbe15cb8f635@i2pn2.org>
 <v62bgv$1s632$6@dont-email.me>
 <211a07c98d1fc183ed3e6c079ec1e883dd45f1cc@i2pn2.org>
 <v62f92$20moo$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 10:33:27 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6d34e4518a0045f34950758630129c85";
	logging-data="2220598"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19RpT4Q7bXxf3maKVfAwo0g"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IFIZHmMUH4ff12Y3SEMlzVfw8wE=
In-Reply-To: <v62f92$20moo$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 3589

Op 03.jul.2024 om 05:07 schreef olcott:
> On 7/2/2024 9:35 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 7/2/24 10:03 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 7/2/2024 8:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 7/2/24 9:32 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 7/2/2024 8:25 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/2/24 9:18 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Professor Sipser probably does understand the x86 language.
>>>>>>> Shared-memory implementation of the Karp-Sipser
>>>>>>> kernelization process
>>>>>>> https://inria.hal.science/hal-03404798/file/hipc2021.pdf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> And the x86 language says the same thing,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> YOU are just a liar, as proved by the fact that you can not give 
>>>>>> the Diagonalization proof you claimed you had.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, you are just too stupid to understand.
>>>>>
>>>>> You continue to assume that you can simply disagree
>>>>> with the x86 language. My memory was refreshed that
>>>>> called you stupid would be a sin according to Christ.
>>>>> I really want to do the best I can to repent.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But I am NOT disagreeing with the x86 language.
>>>>
>>>> Can you point out what fact of it I am disagreing about it?
>>>>
>>>
>>> You keep trying to get away with saying that the simulation is
>>> incorrect when the semantics of the x86 language conclusively
>>> proves that it is correct.
>>
>> Nope, and x86n emulation is only fully correct if it continues to the 
>> final end. 
> 
> void Infinite_Loop()
> {
>    HERE: goto HERE;
> }
> 
> Why do you say such ridiculously stupid things that you are are false?
> 

Your Infinite_Loop does not apply. For a two cycle recursive simulation

void Finite_Recursion (int N) {
   if (N > 0) Finite_Recursion (N - 1);
}

is a better example. This runs for N cycles. When aborted after N-1 
cycles there is no reason to think that it specifies an infinite loop. 
The abort was only too soon.