Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:06:28 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v60ce4$1pfp1$1@i2pn2.org>
References: <v4vrfg$2793f$1@dont-email.me> <v5efod$1ikpr$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5ejau$1iq57$1@dont-email.me> <v5eup8$1lar1$2@dont-email.me>
	<v5f1nm$1lp16$1@dont-email.me> <v5f246$1m2fl$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5f3fg$1lp16$2@dont-email.me> <v5f3j8$1m2fl$2@dont-email.me>
	<v5f54f$1lp16$3@dont-email.me> <v5f5sd$1mcif$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5ght9$21jrt$1@dont-email.me> <v5h558$24jbd$7@dont-email.me>
	<v5jcas$2m18t$2@dont-email.me> <v5k7ju$2qsdr$5@dont-email.me>
	<v5mcvo$1cgj0$3@i2pn2.org> <v5mklg$3cibm$7@dont-email.me>
	<v5mo8a$1d3t3$2@i2pn2.org> <v5mqge$3e4fd$2@dont-email.me>
	<v5msjt$1d3t3$9@i2pn2.org> <v5mtba$3elj0$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5n2ah$1d3t3$10@i2pn2.org> <v5n2sk$3fm1k$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5po6i$1h5u1$1@i2pn2.org> <v5pp9m$2jk8$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5rcrh$fkks$1@dont-email.me> <v5s44b$jvgt$2@dont-email.me>
	<v5tp2t$vsqr$1@dont-email.me> <v5u97g$12udb$6@dont-email.me>
	<v5vi62$1oanb$3@i2pn2.org> <v5vljj$1b0k9$3@dont-email.me>
	<v5vocu$1oanb$10@i2pn2.org> <v5vp03$1fbi8$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:06:28 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1883937"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3098
Lines: 31

Am Mon, 01 Jul 2024 21:34:43 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 7/1/2024 9:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 7/1/24 9:36 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 7/1/2024 7:38 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 7/1/24 8:59 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 7/1/2024 3:23 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>> Op 30.jun.2024 om 19:20 schreef olcott:

>>>> A "Correct Emulation" is one that produces the same result as the
>>>> program at the input.
>>>>
>>> Which can only possibly occur be disregarding the semantics of the x86
>>> language. Liars would do that ignoramuses would do that. Everyone with
>>> the equivalent of a BSCS would know that what I said is true.
Therefore, HHH can’t be simulated by itself.

>> Why do you say that? That is EXACTLY the definition of Correct
>> Emulation.
> 
> Every C programmer that knows what an x86 emulator is knows that when
> HHH emulates the machine language of Infinite_Loop, Infinite_Recursion,
> and DDD that it must abort these emulations so that itself can terminate
> normally.
An emulator does not need to abort. In fact, it should emulate infinite
loops faithfully.

> SO THESE THREE INPUTS DO NOT FREAKING HALT
Why does the emulator halt then?

-- 
Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott:
Objectively I am a genius.